The only possible answer is of course this: back to the beginning. Before the beginning, even.
We are on Earth. And it's 1971 or possibly a few years ahead of that. One of the capsules from the first two films has landed on a California beach. The military are there to greet them. Three astronauts climb out. And they remove their helmets. And to the astonishment of the assembled troops, they're chimps.
Roll credits.
Because I loathe bananas. |
And aged 17 – I just checked BBC Genome, it was February 1993, a Tuesday – I was initially disappointed because dammit I was hoping for another film with, you know, a planet, with a load of apes on it. And there's only three apes that count.
Look, I'm not proud of that. Your tastes are different when you're a teenager.
But I watched it, enthralled, anyway.
And let’s put it out there. I love this film. Apart from the original, out of four sequels, three prequels, two TV shows and one godawful inthemiddlequel, Escape from the Planet of the Apes is still my favourite. I think it's the best, the most thoughtful of the sequels, and the one that works best as a counterpoint to the original movie.
The three apes include of course Cornelius (Roddy McDowall once more), Zira (Kim Hunter) and with them comes ape scientist Dr Milo (Sal Mineo), the last of whom is credited with having recovered George Taylor’s spaceship and with somehow getting it working.
And a depressed gorilla. |
Yes, it’s ever so slightly far-fetched, given the apes didn’t think that powered flight was even possible, but all the pieces were there: two spaceships, waiting to be found (and probably with enough bits in them to make one complete ship), chimp-led expeditions into the Forbidden Zone, and chimps with scientific curiosity and boundless smarts. Screenwriter Paul Dehn simply reasoned that it was possible that an ape scientist we hadn’t met before might have been working on the ships before the nuclear holocaust happened, and that Zira and Cornelius might have gotten on board… and look, what could Dehn do? They went to him and said, more or less, OK, write us another Planet of the Apes film, and we’ve got another budget cut, off you go, and he took the genius step of not only inverting the story, but laying the ground for a new story to begin.
Not only did Dehn solve the problem of how to continue the Planet of the Apes series, but he enabled it to start again, and as we’ll see eventually, Escape from the Planet of the Apes begins a new trilogy of films that will set up and tell that second, more interesting story we mentioned last time. From here on in, we’re not watching humans in a world of apes, we’re watching apes in a world of humans who will, by their very presence, begin its transformation into a world of apes. Apes are our protagonists; apes are our point of view. We are seeing human society from the outside.
I think we need some air. |
Dr. Branton: Well, why doesn't she take it?And as the vets flail about, stunned, and step out for air, the three apes argue about the wisdom of Zira’s outburst, and then the gorilla in the next cage strangles Milo to death.
Zira: Because I loathe bananas!
And it's entirely that sudden. And part of the reason, even though it's only about 15 minutes in, that this is the most pivotal scene in the film is that it has a sort of programmatic effect. Escape from the Planet of the Apes is absolutely the funniest of the Planet of the Apes films; entire sequences are straight comedy, delightful, gentle things, wholly played for laughs. But the comedy is undercut by violence and death. After the comedy comes a sharp swerve into the dark, every time, and the aftermath of the banana scene is there to warn you not to get too cosy.
Of course it's also an inversion of Taylor’s line, the one that drives the apes to distraction because everyone sees he can talk and the secret is uncorked.
Does the other one talk? Only when she lets me. |
But as a matter-of-fact statement, and a funny one, that denies its speaker the status of animal, it's not the bomb that heralds in the second act. No, that's the gorilla strangling poor Milo. That's the violence that follows the comedy.
General Winthrop: You called the zoo?Look, that’s a comic line. That’s not a line from a piece of brutal drama. And that lighter tone works both ways: it makes it in a lot of ways a, brighter, easier watch, and yet when the hammer drops, it drops all the harder.
Gregg: Yes, sir. We’re in luck. Sickbay’s almost empty apart from a mauled foxcub, a deer with pneumonia, and a depressed gorilla.
Take the Presidential Hearing scene. Again, although there's much to laugh at (“Does the other one talk?” “Only when she lets me.”) it's undercut by the presence of Dr. Hasslein (Eric Braeden). This is the same Dr. Hasslein who predicted the effects of the timewarp, and who was namechecked in both the previous films. Here he's the President's scientific advisor, and incidentally doesn't that feel vintage, having a fictional president who listens to scientists? Hasslein’s first appearance in the flesh sets the tone for him.
Fear. |
Reporter: As the President's senior scientific advisor, what do you think you'll take away from this historic meeting?And fear is what he's about, what drives him. Although cold, seemingly callous, Hasslein is afraid. And it's Hasslein who signifies the dark. He's the Doctor Zaius of his milieu, the one who knows the truth and is afraid of it. And this is the big parallel between Escape from the Planet of the Apes and that original film: it's not knowing the truth that defines one's actions, it's whether you're afraid of it.
Hasslein: Fear.
Hasslein picks up on the inconvenient truths of Zira and Cornelius’s statements at the hearing. Hasslein urges that the future they threaten be prevented.
And, consequently, Hasslein is the prime mover of the horror that meets Cornelius and Zira head-on.
Ape fashion. |
A pair of smart, talking apes are a fun media attraction. A pair of smart talking apes who can breed threaten – well, let's face it, they threaten a planet of the apes. Hasslein manoeuvres the apes into the way of tragedy. The apes face Zira’s baby being aborted and surgery to prevent them ever having any more children. They escape, but someone dies in their way. Now they're a public menace.
The good Doctors Hasslein and Zaius are not bad guys. They're worse. They're principled people who do bad things because they want to protect their worlds. Both in their own way fail catastrophically.
It's interesting how critical science fiction of the 70s is of the American government, and just how much that has changed.
(I can't help comparing the profound problems I had with Denis Villeneuve’s Arrival (2016) here. I could totally accept aliens who talk in time-travel smoke language, but I just couldn't get past the idea that the Chinese army was all unnecessarily shoot-first hostile while the American army – the American army – were the measured, diplomatic ones. Yeah, no. Suspension of disbelief shattered.)
Pyjamas. |
President: Now what do you expect me, and the United Nations – though not necessarily in that order – to do about it? Alter what you believe to be the course of the future by slaughtering two innocents, or rather three, now that one of them is pregnant? Herod tried that, and Christ survived.Dr. Hasslein has an understandable motivation, but the very clear-eyed view of Dehn’s script is that a bunch of psychopaths and a bunch of decent but terrified people, if put in charge of the same authority, amount to the same thing and go in the same direction.
Hasslein: Mr. President, Herod lacked our facilities.
Now Zira and Cornelius are in danger. Dixon and Branton take on the roles Cornelius and Zira once took, helping the protagonists to go on the run and risking everything with it. But Zira is about to go into labour. And here the parallels end.
Because here is where Armando comes in.
It's like a baby born on the moon. |
Armando: You're asking me to risk imprisonment for the sake of two fugitive apes? The answer is a thousand times yes!Armando (the peerlessly charming Ricardo Montalban) runs a circus, and he is devoted to the animals, and he's the kind of mirror to Hasslein that Zaius never had, Because like Hasslein, Armando knows the truth, and knows the full extent of the threat, but unlike Hasslein, he would take a more compassionate course. Hasslein and Armando both have a selfless devotion to humanity; but while Hasslein is devoted to humanity's survival as a going concern, Armando's devotion is to humanity as a spiritual ideal. Materialist selflessness and spitirual selflessness stands opposed.
He's with the apes from minute one. He's a free thinker, a traveller, an intensely compassionate, romantic and spiritual figure, and hell, he's Ricardo Montalban, of course he's a romantic figure. And OK, he's the romantic stereotype of the compassionate circus owner, and let us be honest here, that's not necessarily a realistic depiction. But as a man who understands fate and who combines his love of his animals with a profound religious faith, Armando is perfectly placed here, and in the subsequent film, as an agent of a different sort of future.
Anyway, Armando has chimps, including one who has just given birth, and there's a scene where Zira and Cornelius meet the chimp and her baby, and Zira tries to get the kid to say “mama”, which is futile. Armando helps deliver Zira’s baby, whom they call Milo, and helps them to escape.
But they don't escape. The final scenes of Escape from the Planet of the Apes are harrowing. Run to ground on the docks, a gun battle ensues. Hasslein dies, but so do Cornelius and Zira, and there's a heartbreaking, awful moment, where Zira throws her bullet-ridden baby’s corpse into the sea rather than let the military get him.
And that's genuinely shocking, and more so after cuddly fairytale circus owners, and hijinks with bananas and interviews and apes in pyjamas. Ape infanticide ends the film.
Except that once more, we meet a twist. For in a coda, we see that as the baby chimp in Armando’s circus grows,he begins to talk. Zira, switched the babies and Armando either knew along or soon realises and decides to hide the truth. Either way, the future is here.
No escape, after all. |
And that means that now we can tell the second, more interesting of our two stories in earnest. Because now the Planet of the Apes is literally inescapable, we can talk about how it comes to be.
I wouldn't do this for anything else, but now that I've done three, I'm going to ape some other critics' blogs, and rank the films as I go (although the TV series, animated series and book will be excluded). Here's where we stand for now...
Ape Rankings
1. Planet of the Apes
2. Escape from the Planet of the Apes
3. Beneath the Planet of the Apes
If you liked this, I've got an account on Patreon. No donation is too small.